The premise of this history of medieval Spain is to examine "how Muslims, Jews, and Christians created a culture of tolerance." Sadly, for me at least, this goal was not achieved.
First off because of horrible writing. Difficult to get through, and difficult to figure out what the author was hoping to convey from section to section.
Then, because of the emphasis of Professor Menocal's romantic notion of peaceful coexistence over the facts (e.g., the 1066 Granada massacre of Jews). Although I could forgive even this if the writing were clear or interesting; it is neither, which is the primary problem.
Understanding the relationships between these three groups could be fascinating, but this is not the book to read. Just say no.
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Sunday, October 30, 2011
The Accidental Historian: Tales of Trash and Treasure, by Monte Akers
Another book from the Texas Book Festival, and another really interesting author who I had the pleasure to hear speak there.
Unlike the Utley - Beeman or Baker books, Mr. Akers' isn't so much an authoritative history as it is a collection of stories. Many are autobiographical, some emphasize some historic events or more likely people, and all are amusing.
Among the topics: civil war re-enactments, buying historic artifacts, and then there are just plain old stories told over drinks.
Unlike the Utley - Beeman or Baker books, Mr. Akers' isn't so much an authoritative history as it is a collection of stories. Many are autobiographical, some emphasize some historic events or more likely people, and all are amusing.
Among the topics: civil war re-enactments, buying historic artifacts, and then there are just plain old stories told over drinks.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Gangster Tour of Texas, by T. Lindsay Baker
At the Texas Book Festival, I enjoyed hearing the author read a chapter from this book. As a consequence, the voice in my head as I read this text was his -- his soft Texas accent, his cadence and word emphasis. It made the reading altogether more fun.
This is a very different sort of book from another local Texas history text I've just read, in that this one, instead of celebrating heroes, tells the stories of villains. Just as the title indicates.
The downside of this is that I'm personally quite a bit less motivated to take a road trip to see where bad guys did their thing.
But the stories were captivating. This is a fine example of history telling come alive.
There are two other great things about this book. First, at the conclusion of each chapter, you'll find detailed instructions about how to find each of the sites mentioned, including detailed little maps. And second, each chapter ends with a "Judge the evidence for yourself" section providing the detailed references for the story told.
This is a fun book even if you're not crazy about crime stories, because it tells tales of the very early 1900s in story form and is quite well written.
This is a very different sort of book from another local Texas history text I've just read, in that this one, instead of celebrating heroes, tells the stories of villains. Just as the title indicates.
The downside of this is that I'm personally quite a bit less motivated to take a road trip to see where bad guys did their thing.
But the stories were captivating. This is a fine example of history telling come alive.
There are two other great things about this book. First, at the conclusion of each chapter, you'll find detailed instructions about how to find each of the sites mentioned, including detailed little maps. And second, each chapter ends with a "Judge the evidence for yourself" section providing the detailed references for the story told.
This is a fun book even if you're not crazy about crime stories, because it tells tales of the very early 1900s in story form and is quite well written.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
History Ahead: Stories beyond the Texas Roadside Markers, by Dan K. Utley and Cynthia J. Beeman
The best history books not only reveal the past so as to help us learn from it but also are fun to read. This book meets that mark. It is a "micro -history" in that it tells the smaller stories, tales that might otherwise go unknown. And some of the fun comes from the design: the material is entirely based on roadside historical markers in Texas. This means you can not only read about events but also plan your road trip to the specific marker site; this is cool!
Just because I refer to this as a micro - history does not mean the stories are insignificant. The story of Bessie Coleman, who in June of 1921 became "...the first black woman in the world to earn a pilot's license," or of Carl Morene, who was perhaps the least likely person to bring organized music instruction to Schulenburg High School in the 1930s and '40s, are inspirational, touching and meaningful.
Similarly, reading about Margo Jones -- perhaps my theatre friends know the name, but I'd never before heard of her -- was interesting, given that her work in the first half of the 20th century may have played a big role in my ability to see live theatre in a variety of venues today.
Nearly every chapter gives a similar example. This is a very enjoyable read.
But, not without flaw: editing in chapter 19 allowed reference to Margo Jones' 1942 encounter with Tennessee Williams to be described on page 272 and again on page 273 as though it hadn't previously been mentioned. This would be easy to correct in a following edition. [The page references are from my hard copy first edition, which I acquired at the Texas Book Festival, having had the good fortune to also hear the authors speak at one of the sessions.]
All in all this is a book worth owning -- most particularly, but not exclusively, for those living in Texas; it warrants a read.
Just because I refer to this as a micro - history does not mean the stories are insignificant. The story of Bessie Coleman, who in June of 1921 became "...the first black woman in the world to earn a pilot's license," or of Carl Morene, who was perhaps the least likely person to bring organized music instruction to Schulenburg High School in the 1930s and '40s, are inspirational, touching and meaningful.
Similarly, reading about Margo Jones -- perhaps my theatre friends know the name, but I'd never before heard of her -- was interesting, given that her work in the first half of the 20th century may have played a big role in my ability to see live theatre in a variety of venues today.
Nearly every chapter gives a similar example. This is a very enjoyable read.
But, not without flaw: editing in chapter 19 allowed reference to Margo Jones' 1942 encounter with Tennessee Williams to be described on page 272 and again on page 273 as though it hadn't previously been mentioned. This would be easy to correct in a following edition. [The page references are from my hard copy first edition, which I acquired at the Texas Book Festival, having had the good fortune to also hear the authors speak at one of the sessions.]
All in all this is a book worth owning -- most particularly, but not exclusively, for those living in Texas; it warrants a read.
Monday, September 5, 2011
On China, by Henry Kissinger
Rarely have I turned the last page of a book and, without any conscious thought say, "phenomenal." That was my reaction to Dr Kissinger*'s recently published broad and insightful text on China.
At 530 pages this book may look intimidating, but the writing is clear, captivating and compelling, and although it may take a few days to read, this is hardly a dense or unfriendly text.
Dr Kissinger takes us through 40 years of US diplomatic history with China. But this is not just about the history (fascinating as it is); understanding the background that led China to its current status is extremely useful as a going forward exercise.
I recommend this book without reservation to anyone who does or anticipates doing business with China, to anyone who wants to understand the pre-eminent diplomatic focus that faces the next generation or two of Americans, and to anyone who believes it is important to learn from history.
To that last point: in his introductory chapter, "The Singularity of China," Dr Kissinger provides the cultural context with which to consider interactions with the Chinese. In so doing, he also points out a glaring flaw in American foreign relations, one that continues to unnecessarily take a toll on our military and our economy. (It is important to point out that I'm connecting these dots; the author didn't and there's no indication it was his intent.) It is this: when we think about interactions with other governments, we use chess as the metaphor. "[chess] is about total victory. The purpose of the game is checkmate, to put the opposing king into a position where he cannot move without being destroyed."
In contrast, "China's most enduring game" is wei qi, approximately pronounced way chee. "The wei qi player seeks relative advantage. ... wei qi generates strategic flexibility." Dr Kissinger relates this thinking to Sun Tzu's guidance on strategy: "A successful commander waits before charging headlong into battle. ... a doctrine less of territorial conquest than of psychological dominance..."
Consider this in the context of the continued US presence in both Iraq and Afganistan.
Back to China. A more direct issue is the conflict between America's belief it has the moral imperative to tell other nations (and thus cultures) how to run their sovereign nations, and China's irreducible commitment, born of its history of interaction with British and other colonial interests in the past couple of hundred years, to not be bullied by other nations. As Dr Kissinger paints it, an unfortunate event such as Tienamen Square (where in 1989 protesters were forcibly, i.e., violently removed, and more importantly, in view of the cameras of the world press) is viewed by the Chinese government as only that: an unfortunate event. In the eyes of the US, it is viewed as a fundamental failure of human rights.
As a consequence, Americans tend to engage in social re-engineering diplomacy, trying to tie trade agreements to changes in China's internal structure. China's view is to simply reject meddling in their domestic affairs as meddling, and to point out that the US doesn't have its own house in order with regard to human rights.
So if you were a Chinese government official, you'd observe the unprovoked US invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan (especially now that we know the weapons of mass destruction story was untrue) and translate Congress' hard line oratory as a literal risk of war. Consider Liu Mingfu's "China Dream: the great power thinking and strategic positioning of China in the post-American age," just briefly referenced by Dr Kissinger. Colonel Liu (as I understand it) suggests that war can be avoided if the US can stifle its hegemonic aspirations. (One must rely on English language analysis of Liu's writing, see perhaps Cheng Li's "China in the Year 2020: three political scenarios," at the Brookings Institute, or Christopher Hughes' "In Case You Missed It: China dream," in The China Beat.)
To China, appearances matter, and events as simple as President Obama meeting with the Dali Lama can be viewed as attempted interference with China's domestic policy.
To put this into context, imagine a group in the US, proposing that a part of the country secede from the Union. How would President Lincoln have interpreted a cheerful meeting in Beijing between Jefferson Davis and the Chinese head of state? Yes, I know: the Dali Lama is the very image of pacifism, and recently retired from his role as the head of Tibet to focus entirely on his religious leadership role. But to the Chinese government, the parallels may be considerable.
My only complaint about this book is that the epilogue seemed too brief and too imprecise: Dr Kissinger imagines a "Pacific community" (for example, see Lee Kwan Yew's comments) but doesn't clearly articulate the implications, including national self-interest values (to the US).
All in all though, a small complaint about an extraordinary work from one of the finest minds of American diplomacy in action.
*Many readers may be unfamiliar with Dr Kissinger; please click on the reference link. In short, Kissinger escaped Germany to the US where he served in the Army, got his PhD at Harvard, and in 1973 became Richard Nixon's Secretary of State. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 and the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1977.
At 530 pages this book may look intimidating, but the writing is clear, captivating and compelling, and although it may take a few days to read, this is hardly a dense or unfriendly text.
Dr Kissinger takes us through 40 years of US diplomatic history with China. But this is not just about the history (fascinating as it is); understanding the background that led China to its current status is extremely useful as a going forward exercise.
I recommend this book without reservation to anyone who does or anticipates doing business with China, to anyone who wants to understand the pre-eminent diplomatic focus that faces the next generation or two of Americans, and to anyone who believes it is important to learn from history.
To that last point: in his introductory chapter, "The Singularity of China," Dr Kissinger provides the cultural context with which to consider interactions with the Chinese. In so doing, he also points out a glaring flaw in American foreign relations, one that continues to unnecessarily take a toll on our military and our economy. (It is important to point out that I'm connecting these dots; the author didn't and there's no indication it was his intent.) It is this: when we think about interactions with other governments, we use chess as the metaphor. "[chess] is about total victory. The purpose of the game is checkmate, to put the opposing king into a position where he cannot move without being destroyed."
In contrast, "China's most enduring game" is wei qi, approximately pronounced way chee. "The wei qi player seeks relative advantage. ... wei qi generates strategic flexibility." Dr Kissinger relates this thinking to Sun Tzu's guidance on strategy: "A successful commander waits before charging headlong into battle. ... a doctrine less of territorial conquest than of psychological dominance..."
Consider this in the context of the continued US presence in both Iraq and Afganistan.
Back to China. A more direct issue is the conflict between America's belief it has the moral imperative to tell other nations (and thus cultures) how to run their sovereign nations, and China's irreducible commitment, born of its history of interaction with British and other colonial interests in the past couple of hundred years, to not be bullied by other nations. As Dr Kissinger paints it, an unfortunate event such as Tienamen Square (where in 1989 protesters were forcibly, i.e., violently removed, and more importantly, in view of the cameras of the world press) is viewed by the Chinese government as only that: an unfortunate event. In the eyes of the US, it is viewed as a fundamental failure of human rights.
As a consequence, Americans tend to engage in social re-engineering diplomacy, trying to tie trade agreements to changes in China's internal structure. China's view is to simply reject meddling in their domestic affairs as meddling, and to point out that the US doesn't have its own house in order with regard to human rights.
So if you were a Chinese government official, you'd observe the unprovoked US invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan (especially now that we know the weapons of mass destruction story was untrue) and translate Congress' hard line oratory as a literal risk of war. Consider Liu Mingfu's "China Dream: the great power thinking and strategic positioning of China in the post-American age," just briefly referenced by Dr Kissinger. Colonel Liu (as I understand it) suggests that war can be avoided if the US can stifle its hegemonic aspirations. (One must rely on English language analysis of Liu's writing, see perhaps Cheng Li's "China in the Year 2020: three political scenarios," at the Brookings Institute, or Christopher Hughes' "In Case You Missed It: China dream," in The China Beat.)
To China, appearances matter, and events as simple as President Obama meeting with the Dali Lama can be viewed as attempted interference with China's domestic policy.
To put this into context, imagine a group in the US, proposing that a part of the country secede from the Union. How would President Lincoln have interpreted a cheerful meeting in Beijing between Jefferson Davis and the Chinese head of state? Yes, I know: the Dali Lama is the very image of pacifism, and recently retired from his role as the head of Tibet to focus entirely on his religious leadership role. But to the Chinese government, the parallels may be considerable.
My only complaint about this book is that the epilogue seemed too brief and too imprecise: Dr Kissinger imagines a "Pacific community" (for example, see Lee Kwan Yew's comments) but doesn't clearly articulate the implications, including national self-interest values (to the US).
All in all though, a small complaint about an extraordinary work from one of the finest minds of American diplomacy in action.
*Many readers may be unfamiliar with Dr Kissinger; please click on the reference link. In short, Kissinger escaped Germany to the US where he served in the Army, got his PhD at Harvard, and in 1973 became Richard Nixon's Secretary of State. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 and the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1977.
Labels:
biographical,
history,
non-fiction,
political,
top-ten-candidate
Sunday, August 21, 2011
Gates of Fire, by Steven Pressfield
This is an outstanding novel! I'm not a fan of history or military books and this is both, yet it is so well written and so compelling that is transcends genre limitation.
The novel is about the Spartans and the battle at Thermopylae in 480 CBE. The king of Persia, Xerxes, wanted to incorporate Greece into his enormous empire; the Spartans sought to slow their advance and, by sacrificing their lives, affect the morale of both groups (the Persians negatively, the other Greek forces positively).
The story is told by Xeo, the only Spartan survivor of the battle who is captured by Xerxes' forces and asked to explain the thinking that led to the Spartan's campaign. Consequently there's ample room for story line that goes far beyond the gory battle description.
I was impressed by Mr Pressfield's writing in another of his novels that I read recently; this one, however, is even stronger. I recommend it highly as a dramatic read that happens to have some war scenes, that happens to take place a long time ago but which stands on its own as an excellent work.
The novel is about the Spartans and the battle at Thermopylae in 480 CBE. The king of Persia, Xerxes, wanted to incorporate Greece into his enormous empire; the Spartans sought to slow their advance and, by sacrificing their lives, affect the morale of both groups (the Persians negatively, the other Greek forces positively).
The story is told by Xeo, the only Spartan survivor of the battle who is captured by Xerxes' forces and asked to explain the thinking that led to the Spartan's campaign. Consequently there's ample room for story line that goes far beyond the gory battle description.
I was impressed by Mr Pressfield's writing in another of his novels that I read recently; this one, however, is even stronger. I recommend it highly as a dramatic read that happens to have some war scenes, that happens to take place a long time ago but which stands on its own as an excellent work.
Saturday, June 11, 2011
Loving Frank, by Nancy Horan
I came across this book through the recommendation of a friend during intermission at the Austin Playhouse theatre quite a long time ago. I bought the book immediately and have tried ever so diligently to read it since. But I find that after only a few pages my attention wanders, which explains why even though months have past, I've scarcely made it through half this novel.
The premise is a historical fiction about Mamah Cheney and her love affair with architect Frank Lloyd Wright. This novel got great reviews and by every indication should have held my interest. Perhaps I've read too many spy / murder / thriller / action novels lately and this has dulled my appreciation for literature. But in recognition of the facts, however unpleasant, I will confess: this book is tagged "unread" as I'm simply giving up on it.
The premise is a historical fiction about Mamah Cheney and her love affair with architect Frank Lloyd Wright. This novel got great reviews and by every indication should have held my interest. Perhaps I've read too many spy / murder / thriller / action novels lately and this has dulled my appreciation for literature. But in recognition of the facts, however unpleasant, I will confess: this book is tagged "unread" as I'm simply giving up on it.
Saturday, January 22, 2011
The Pillars of the Earth, by Ken Follett
This is a terrific historical novel, a love story, a tale of good and evil. The character development is excellent, the plotting interesting. And in shear page count, a good return on investment.
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Deception, by Eleanor Cooney & Daniel Altieri
This long, twisted mystery is set in 7th century China. Magistrate Dee is the detective and Madame Wu and her mother are the evil doers, Wu becoming Empress of China. A form of Buddhism with deep ties to magic and superstition is at the end silenced by the practical Confucianism of Dee.
I schlepped this 640 page (hard cover version) book on several flights before finishing it, and it never lost my interest.
I schlepped this 640 page (hard cover version) book on several flights before finishing it, and it never lost my interest.
Saturday, July 17, 2010
The Last Jew, by Noah Gordon
This historical novel (taking place in Spain during the Inquisition) is one of the best books I've read. Highly recommended.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Sin in the Second City, by Karen Abbott

What a strange book! This is a biography, of sorts, of the Chicago madams Minna and Ada Everleigh. They were proprietors of a successful house of prostitution in the early 1900s. The author writes about their business and the surrounding politics of the time.
It wasn't really very interesting to me, but I admire the author's Schama -style invention of dialogue and event details to fill out a historical text.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




